By neither acting nor choosing not to act, that knowing a situation is often enough and this process is action. How can I answer the question? Speaking what I know to be true, a meeting between the known and what is shown to be otherwise. Not to set up a dialectic, not to simplify things into two categories as inner and outer, but to use conflict as a stepping stone. That by standing up my lap vanishes.
_
And I would be wrong if I thought this were true, these words. Surely someone or something disagrees, and even if they are not here to dispute it, consider it done. A cat snores. The question of meaning is the answer leading by example, by risking one’s own conventions. By risking more. There are many ways to fail and be unsure but pushing forward regardless is conviction, an acceptance of the inevitable uncertainties and the limits of dualism: that one or the other or the distance in-between; the location, is just a mark on a map, a bird’s eye view. Those eyes, the small ones, and why courage fails us to stay with ourselves.
_
And I would be wrong if I thought this were true, these words. Surely someone or something disagrees, and even if they are not here to dispute it, consider it done. A cat snores. The question of meaning is the answer leading by example, by risking one’s own conventions. By risking more. There are many ways to fail and be unsure but pushing forward regardless is conviction, an acceptance of the inevitable uncertainties and the limits of dualism: that one or the other or the distance in-between; the location, is just a mark on a map, a bird’s eye view. Those eyes, the small ones, and why courage fails us to stay with ourselves.
